code.vegaprotocol.io/vega@v0.79.0/core/integration/features/mark-price/0009-MRKP-010.feature (about) 1 Feature: Test setting of mark price algorithm for futures and perpetual markets 2 Background: 3 Given the following network parameters are set: 4 | name | value | 5 | network.markPriceUpdateMaximumFrequency | 4s | 6 And the perpetual oracles from "0xCAFECAFE1": 7 | name | asset | settlement property | settlement type | schedule property | schedule type | margin funding factor | interest rate | clamp lower bound | clamp upper bound | quote name | settlement decimals | 8 | perp-oracle | USD | perp.ETH.value | TYPE_INTEGER | perp.funding.cue | TYPE_TIMESTAMP | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.9 | ETH | 18 | 9 And the liquidity monitoring parameters: 10 | name | triggering ratio | time window | scaling factor | 11 | lqm-params | 0.00 | 24h | 1e-9 | 12 And the simple risk model named "simple-risk-model": 13 | long | short | max move up | min move down | probability of trading | 14 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 100 | -100 | 0.2 | 15 And the markets: 16 | id | quote name | asset | liquidity monitoring | risk model | margin calculator | auction duration | fees | price monitoring | data source config | linear slippage factor | quadratic slippage factor | sla params | price type | decay weight | decay power | cash amount | source weights | source staleness tolerance | market type | 17 | ETH/FEB23 | ETH | USD | lqm-params | simple-risk-model | default-margin-calculator | 1 | default-none | default-none | default-eth-for-future | 0.25 | 0 | default-futures | last trade | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.1,0.2,0.3,0.6 | 3h0m0s,2s,24h0m0s,1h25m0s | future | 18 | ETH/FEB22 | ETH | USD | lqm-params | simple-risk-model | default-margin-calculator | 1 | default-none | default-none | perp-oracle | 0.25 | 0 | default-futures | last trade | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.1,0.2,0.3,0.6 | 3h0m0s,2s,24h0m0s,1h25m0s | perp | 19 20 Scenario: Check that a market has been created successfully with the last trade price algo for mark price (0009-MRKP-010, 0009-MRKP-011) 21 Given the parties deposit on asset's general account the following amount: 22 | party | asset | amount | 23 | buySideProvider | USD | 100000000000 | 24 | sellSideProvider | USD | 100000000000 | 25 | party | USD | 48050 | 26 | buySideProvider1 | USD | 100000000000 | 27 | sellSideProvider1 | USD | 100000000000 | 28 | party1 | USD | 48050 | 29 And the parties place the following orders: 30 | party | market id | side | volume | price | resulting trades | type | tif | reference | 31 | buySideProvider | ETH/FEB23 | buy | 10 | 14900 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 32 | buySideProvider | ETH/FEB23 | buy | 1 | 15000 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 33 | buySideProvider | ETH/FEB23 | buy | 3 | 15900 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 34 | party | ETH/FEB23 | sell | 3 | 15900 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 35 | party | ETH/FEB23 | sell | 2 | 15902 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | party-sell-2 | 36 | party | ETH/FEB23 | sell | 1 | 15904 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | party-sell-3 | 37 | sellSideProvider | ETH/FEB23 | sell | 1 | 100000 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 38 | sellSideProvider | ETH/FEB23 | sell | 10 | 100100 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 39 | buySideProvider1 | ETH/FEB22 | buy | 10 | 14900 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 40 | buySideProvider1 | ETH/FEB22 | buy | 1 | 15000 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 41 | buySideProvider1 | ETH/FEB22 | buy | 3 | 15900 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 42 | party1 | ETH/FEB22 | sell | 3 | 15900 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 43 | party1 | ETH/FEB22 | sell | 2 | 15902 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | party-sell-2 | 44 | party1 | ETH/FEB22 | sell | 1 | 15904 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | party-sell-3 | 45 | sellSideProvider1 | ETH/FEB22 | sell | 1 | 100000 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 46 | sellSideProvider1 | ETH/FEB22 | sell | 10 | 100100 | 0 | TYPE_LIMIT | TIF_GTC | | 47 48 And the mark price algo should be "COMPOSITE_PRICE_TYPE_LAST_TRADE" for the market "ETH/FEB23" 49 And the mark price algo should be "COMPOSITE_PRICE_TYPE_LAST_TRADE" for the market "ETH/FEB22" 50 51 52