cuelang.org/go@v0.10.1/internal/filetypes/util.go (about) 1 // Copyright 2020 CUE Authors 2 // 3 // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); 4 // you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. 5 // You may obtain a copy of the License at 6 // 7 // http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 8 // 9 // Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software 10 // distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, 11 // WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. 12 // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and 13 // limitations under the License. 14 15 package filetypes 16 17 import ( 18 "strings" 19 20 "cuelang.org/go/cue/ast" 21 ) 22 23 // IsPackage reports whether a command-line argument is a package based on its 24 // lexical representation alone. 25 func IsPackage(s string) bool { 26 switch s { 27 case ".", "..": 28 return true 29 case "", "-": 30 return false 31 } 32 33 // This goes off the assumption that file names may not have a `:` in their 34 // name in cue. 35 // A filename must have an extension or be preceded by a qualifier argument. 36 // So strings of the form foo/bar:baz, where bar is a valid identifier and 37 // absolute package 38 if p := strings.LastIndexByte(s, ':'); p > 0 { 39 if !ast.IsValidIdent(s[p+1:]) { 40 return false 41 } 42 // For a non-pkg, the part before : may only be lowercase and '+'. 43 // In addition, a package necessarily must have a slash of some form. 44 return strings.ContainsAny(s[:p], `/.\`) 45 } 46 47 // Assuming we terminate search for packages once a scoped qualifier is 48 // found, we know that any file without an extension (except maybe '-') 49 // is invalid. We can therefore assume it is a package. 50 // The section may still contain a dot, for instance ./foo/., ./.foo/, or ./foo/... 51 return strings.TrimLeft(fileExt(s), ".") == "" 52 53 // NOTE/TODO: we have not needed to check whether it is an absolute package 54 // or whether the package starts with a dot. Potentially we could thus relax 55 // the requirement that packages be dots if it is clear that the package 56 // name will not interfere with command names in all circumstances. 57 }