github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v3@v3.2.1/docs/proposals/resource-deletion-with-approval.md (about) 1 --- 2 title: Neat-enhancement-idea 3 authors: 4 - "@alexmt" 5 sponsors: 6 - TBD 7 reviewers: 8 - "@jessesuen" 9 - TBD 10 approvers: 11 - "@jessesuen" 12 - TBD 13 14 creation-date: 2020-04-19 15 last-updated: 2020-04-19 16 17 --- 18 # Neat Enhancement Idea 19 20 Support manual approval for pruning and deleting Kubernetes resources during application syncing/deletion. 21 22 ## Summary 23 24 Introduce Kubernetes resource-level annotations that require manual user approval using Argo CD UI/CLI/API before the 25 resource is pruned or deleted. The annotations should be respected while Argo CD attempts to synchronize or delete the 26 application. 27 28 ## Motivation 29 30 We’ve seen cases where Argo CD deleted Kubernetes resources due to a bug or misconfiguration. Examples include [corrupted 31 data](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/issues/4423) in Redis, user errors 32 ([1](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/issues/9093), [2](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/issues/4844)) 33 and [bug](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/issues/3473) in the automation on top of Argo CD. These examples don’t 34 mean Argo CD is not reliable; however, there are cases where misbehavior is catastrophic, and erroneous deletion is not 35 acceptable. Examples include the app-of-apps pattern where Argo CD is used to manage itself, or namespaces in production 36 clusters. 37 38 ### Goals 39 40 The goals of a proposal ares: 41 42 #### Allow developers to mark resources that require manual approval before application deletion. 43 44 Developers should be able to add an annotation to resources that require manual approval before deletion. The annotation 45 should be respected by Argo CD when it attempts to delete the application. 46 47 #### Allow developers to mark resources that require manual approval before pruning 48 49 Developers should be able to add an annotation to resources that require manual approval before pruning. The annotation 50 should be respected by Argo CD when it attempts to prune extra resources while syncing the application. 51 52 ### Non-Goals 53 54 #### Implement automatic self check while deleting resources 55 56 We've made our best effort to implement corrected behavior, and as of now, we are not aware of any bugs that cause 57 erroneous deletion. The goal of this proposal is to provide a safety net for cases where deletion is not acceptable. 58 59 ## Proposal 60 61 It is proposed to introduce two new sync options for Argo CD applications: `Prune=confirm` and `Delete=confirm`. Options would 62 protect resources from accidental deletion during cascading application deletion as well as during sync operations. 63 64 ### Introduce `confirm` option for Prune sync option. 65 66 Argo CD already supports `argocd.argoproj.io/sync-options: Prune=false` sync option that prevents resource deletion while syncing 67 the application. This, however, is not ideal since it prevents implementing fully automated workflows that include resource deletion. 68 69 In order to improve the situation, we propose to introduce `confirm` option for Prune sync option. When `confirm` option is set, Argo CD should pause the sync operation 70 **before deleting any app resources** and wait for the user to confirm the deletion. The confirmation can be done in a very friendly way using Argo CD UI, CLI or API. 71 72 * **Sync Operation status**. I suggest not to introduce new sync operation states to avoid disturbing the existing automation around syncing (CI pipelines, scripts etc). 73 If Argo CD is waiting for the operation state should remain `Progressing`. Once the user confirms the deletion, the operation should resume. 74 * **Sync Waves**. The sync wave should be "paused" while Argo CD is waiting for the user to confirm the deletion. No difference from waiting for the resource to became healthy. 75 76 ### Introduce `confirm` option for Delete sync option. 77 78 Similarly to `Prune` sync option we need to introduce `confirm` value for `Delete` sync option: `argocd.argoproj.io/sync-options: Delete=confirm`. The `confirm` option 79 should pause the sync operation **before deleting any app resources** and wait for the user to confirm the deletion. The confirmation can be done in a very friendly way 80 using Argo CD UI, CLI or API. 81 82 83 ### Friendly prunning/deletion manual approval 84 85 Since we know Argo CD is often used to implement fully automated developer workflows that include resource deletion, the 86 deletion approval process should be as painless as possible. This way, platform administrators can instruct end users to 87 apply the new prune/delete option to resources that require special care without significantly disturbing the developer 88 experience. 89 90 In both cases where Argo CD requires manual approval, the user should be able to approve the deletion using Argo CD UI, 91 CLI, or API. The approval process should be as simple as possible and should not require the user to understand the 92 internals of Argo CD. 93 94 #### New `requiresDeletionApproval` resource field in application status 95 96 A new field `requiresDeletionApproval` should be added to the `status.resources` list items. The field should be set to `true` when the resource deletion approval is required. 97 98 ```yaml 99 - health: 100 status: Healthy 101 kind: Service 102 name: guestbook-ui 103 namespace: default 104 status: OutOfSync 105 version: v1 106 requiresPruning: true 107 requiresDeletionApproval: true # new field that indicates that deletion approval is required 108 ``` 109 110 The Argo CD UI, CLI should visualize the `requiresDeletionApproval` field so that the user can easily discover which resources require manual approval. 111 112 #### Approve deletion resource action 113 114 The Argo CD UI, CLI should bundle the `Approve Deletion` [resource action](https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/operator-manual/resource_actions/) 115 that would allow the user to approve the deletion. The action should patch the resource with the `argocd.argoproj.io/deletion-approved: true` annotation. 116 Once annotation is applied the Argo CD should proceed with the deletion. 117 118 The main reason to use the action is that we can reuse existing [RBAC](https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/operator-manual/rbac/) to control who can approve the deletion. 119 120 #### UI/CLI Convenience to approve all resources 121 122 The Argo CD UI should provide a convenient way to approve resources that require manual approval. The existing user interface will provide a button that allows end user 123 execute the `Approve Deletion` action and approve resources one by one. In addition to the single resource approval, the UI should provide a way to approve all resources 124 that require manual approval. The new button should execute the `Approve Deletion` action for all resources that require manual approval. 125 126 Argo CD CLI would no need changes since existing `argocd app actions run` command allows to execute an action against multiple resources. 127 128 #### Require deletion approval notification 129 130 The default Argo CD notification catalog should include a trigger and notification template that notifies the user when 131 deletion approval is required. The notification template should include a list of resources that require approval. 132 133 134 #### Declarative approval 135 136 The user should be able to approve resource deletion without using the UI or CLI by manually adding the `argocd.argoproj.io/deletion-approved: true` annotation to the resource. 137 138 ### Use cases 139 140 Add a list of detailed use cases this enhancement intends to take care of. 141 142 ## Use case 1: 143 144 As a developer, I would like to mark resources that require manual pruning approval so I can prevent the accidental deletion of critical resources. 145 146 ## Use case 2: 147 148 As a developer, I would like to mark resources that require manual deletion approval so I can prevent the accidental deletion of critical resources. 149 150 151 ### Security Considerations 152 153 The resource approval would require a mechanism to control who can approve the deletion. The proposal to use 154 resource-level actions solves this problem and allows us to reuse the existing RBAC model. 155 156 ### Risks and Mitigations 157 158 None. 159 160 ### Upgrade / Downgrade Strategy 161 162 In case of rollback to the previous version the sync option would be ignored and the resources would be deleted as before. 163 164 ## Open Issues 165 166 The proposal would require end users to learn about the new behavior and adjust their workflows. It includes a set of 167 enhancements aimed at minimizing the impact on end users. 168 169 ## Alternatives 170 171 None.