github.com/jdgcs/sqlite3@v1.12.1-0.20210908114423-bc5f96e4dd51/testdata/tcl/analyzeD.test (about) 1 # 2014-10-04 2 # 3 # The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of 4 # a legal notice, here is a blessing: 5 # 6 # May you do good and not evil. 7 # May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others. 8 # May you share freely, never taking more than you give. 9 # 10 #*********************************************************************** 11 # This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. 12 # This file implements tests for the ANALYZE command. 13 # 14 15 set testdir [file dirname $argv0] 16 source $testdir/tester.tcl 17 set ::testprefix analyzeD 18 19 ifcapable {!stat4} { 20 finish_test 21 return 22 } 23 24 25 # Set up a table with the following properties: 26 # 27 # * Contains 1000 rows. 28 # * Column a contains even integers between 0 and 18, inclusive (so that 29 # a=? for any such integer matches 100 rows). 30 # * Column b contains integers between 0 and 9, inclusive. 31 # * Column c contains integers between 0 and 199, inclusive (so that 32 # for any such integer, c=? matches 5 rows). 33 # * Then add 7 rows with a new value for "a" - 3001. The stat4 table will 34 # not contain any samples with a=3001. 35 # 36 do_execsql_test 1.0 { 37 CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c); 38 } 39 do_test 1.1 { 40 for {set i 1} {$i < 1000} {incr i} { 41 set c [expr $i % 200] 42 execsql { INSERT INTO t1(a, b, c) VALUES( 2*($i/100), $i%10, $c ) } 43 } 44 45 execsql { 46 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3001, 3001, 3001); 47 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3001, 3001, 3002); 48 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3001, 3001, 3003); 49 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3001, 3001, 3004); 50 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3001, 3001, 3005); 51 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3001, 3001, 3006); 52 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3001, 3001, 3007); 53 54 CREATE INDEX t1_ab ON t1(a, b); 55 CREATE INDEX t1_c ON t1(c); 56 57 ANALYZE; 58 } 59 } {} 60 61 # With full ANALYZE data, SQLite sees that c=150 (5 rows) is better than 62 # a=3001 (7 rows). 63 # 64 do_eqp_test 1.2 { 65 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=3001 AND c=150; 66 } {SEARCH t1 USING INDEX t1_c (c=?)} 67 68 do_test 1.3 { 69 execsql { DELETE FROM sqlite_stat1 } 70 db close 71 sqlite3 db test.db 72 } {} 73 74 # Without stat1, because 3001 is larger than all samples in the stat4 75 # table, SQLite thinks that a=3001 matches just 1 row. So it (incorrectly) 76 # chooses it over the c=150 index (5 rows). Even with stat1 data, things 77 # worked this way before commit [e6f7f97dbc]. 78 # 79 do_eqp_test 1.4 { 80 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=3001 AND c=150; 81 } {SEARCH t1 USING INDEX t1_ab (a=?)} 82 83 do_test 1.5 { 84 execsql { 85 UPDATE t1 SET a=13 WHERE a = 3001; 86 ANALYZE; 87 } 88 } {} 89 90 do_eqp_test 1.6 { 91 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=13 AND c=150; 92 } {SEARCH t1 USING INDEX t1_c (c=?)} 93 94 do_test 1.7 { 95 execsql { DELETE FROM sqlite_stat1 } 96 db close 97 sqlite3 db test.db 98 } {} 99 100 # Same test as 1.4, except this time the 7 rows that match the a=? condition 101 # do not feature larger values than all rows in the stat4 table. So SQLite 102 # gets this right, even without stat1 data. 103 do_eqp_test 1.8 { 104 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=13 AND c=150; 105 } {SEARCH t1 USING INDEX t1_c (c=?)} 106 107 finish_test