wa-lang.org/wazero@v1.0.2/site/content/history.md (about) 1 +++ 2 title = "History of wazero" 3 +++ 4 5 wazero was originally developed by [Takeshi Yoneda][1] as a hobby project in 6 mid 2020. In late 2021, it was sponsored by Tetrate as a top-level project. 7 That said, Takeshi's original motivation is as relevant today as when he 8 started the project, and worthwhile reading: 9 10 If you want to provide Wasm host environments in your Go programs, currently 11 there's no other choice than using CGO leveraging the state-of-the-art 12 runtimes written in C++/Rust (e.g. V8, Wasmtime, Wasmer, WAVM, etc.), and 13 there's no pure Go Wasm runtime out there. (There's only one exception named 14 [wagon][2], but it was archived with the mention to this project.) 15 16 First, why do you want to write host environments in Go? You might want to have 17 plugin systems in your Go project and want these plugin systems to be 18 safe/fast/flexible, and enable users to write plugins in their favorite 19 languages. That's where Wasm comes into play. You write your own Wasm host 20 environments and embed Wasm runtime in your projects, and now users are able to 21 write plugins in their own favorite languages (AssemblyScript, C, C++, Rust, 22 Zig, etc.). As a specific example, you maybe write proxy severs in Go and want 23 to allow users to extend the proxy via [Proxy-Wasm ABI][3]. Maybe you are 24 writing server-side rendering applications via Wasm, or [OpenPolicyAgent][4] 25 is using Wasm for plugin system. 26 27 However, experienced Go developers often avoid using CGO because it 28 introduces complexity. For example, CGO projects are larger and complicated to 29 consume due to their libc + shared library dependency. Debugging is more 30 difficult for Go developers when most of a library is written in Rustlang. 31 [_CGO is not Go_][5] [ -- _Rob_ _Pike_][6] dives in deeper. In short, the 32 primary motivation to start wazero was to avoid CGO. 33 34 wazero compiles WebAssembly modules into native assembly (Compiler) by default. You 35 may be surprised to find equal or better performance vs mature Compiler-style 36 runtimes because [CGO is slow][7]. More specifically, if you make large amount 37 of CGO calls which cross the boundary between Go and C (stack) space, then the 38 usage of CGO could be a bottleneck. 39 40 [1]: https://github.com/mathetake 41 [2]: https://github.com/go-interpreter/wagon 42 [3]: https://github.com/proxy-wasm/spec 43 [4]: https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/latest/wasm/ 44 [5]: https://dave.cheney.net/2016/01/18/cgo-is-not-go 45 [6]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAAkCSZUG1c&t=757s 46 [7]: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/19574