wa-lang.org/wazero@v1.0.2/site/content/languages/_index.md (about) 1 +++ 2 title = "Languages" 3 layout = "single" 4 +++ 5 6 WebAssembly has a virtual machine architecture where the host is the embedding 7 process and the guest is a program compiled into the WebAssembly Binary Format, 8 also known as Wasm. The first step is to take a source file and compile it into 9 the Wasm bytecode. 10 11 e.g. If your source is in Go, you might compile it with TinyGo. 12 ```goat 13 .-----------. .----------------------. .-----------. 14 / main.go /---->| tinygo -target=wasi +---->/ main.wasm / 15 '-----+-----' '----------------------' '-----------' 16 ``` 17 18 Below are notes wazero contributed so far, in alphabetical order by language. 19 20 * [Go](go) e.g. `GOARCH=wasm GOOS=js go build -o X.wasm X.go` 21 * [TinyGo](tinygo) e.g. `tinygo build -o X.wasm -target=wasi X.go` 22 * [Rust](rust) e.g. `rustc -o X.wasm --target wasm32-wasi X.rs` 23 24 wazero is a runtime that embeds in Go applications, not a web browser. As 25 such, these notes bias towards backend use of WebAssembly, not browser use. 26 27 Disclaimer: These are not official documentation, nor represent the teams who 28 maintain language compilers. If you see any errors, please help [maintain][1] 29 these and [star our GitHub repository][2] if they are helpful. Together, we can 30 make WebAssembly easier on the next person. 31 32 ## Constraints 33 34 The [WebAssembly Core specification]({{< ref "/specs#core" >}}) defines a 35 stack-based virtual machine. The only features that work by default are 36 computational in nature, and the only way to communicate is via functions, 37 memory or global variables. 38 39 WebAssembly has no standard library or system call interface to implement 40 features the operating system would otherwise provide. Certain capabilities, 41 such as forking a process, will not work. Support of common I/O features, such 42 as writing to the console, vary. See [System Calls](#system-calls) for more. 43 44 Software is more than technical constraints. WebAssembly remains a relatively 45 niche target, with limited maintenance and development. This means that certain 46 features may not work, yet, even if they could technically. 47 48 In general, developing with WebAssembly is difficult, and fewer problems can 49 be discovered at compilation time vs more supported targets. This results in 50 more runtime errors, or even panics. Where error messages exist, they may be 51 misleading. Finally, the languages maintainers may be less familiar with how to 52 solve the problems, and/or rely on less available key maintainers. 53 54 ### Mitigating Constraints 55 56 The above constraints affect the library design and dependency choices in your 57 source, and by extension the choices of library dependencies you can use. In 58 extreme cases, constraints or support concerns may lead developers to choose 59 newer languages like [Zig][10]. 60 61 Regardless of the programming language used, the best advice is to unit test 62 your code, and run tests with your intended WebAssembly runtime, like wazero. 63 64 These tests should cover the critical paths of your code, including errors. 65 Doing so protects your time. You'll have higher confidence, and more efficient 66 means to communicate problems vs ad-hoc reports. 67 68 ## System Calls 69 70 WebAssembly is a stack-based virtual machine specification, so operates at a 71 lower level than an operating system. For functionality the operating system 72 would otherwise provide, system interfaces are needed. 73 74 Programming languages usually include a standard library, with features that 75 require I/O, such as writing to the console. Portability is helped along with 76 [POSIX][3] conforming implementations of system calls, such as `fd_read`. 77 78 There is a [WebAssembly System Interface]({{< ref "/specs#wasi" >}}), a.k.a. 79 WASI, which defines host functions loosely based on POSIX. There's also a 80 de facto implementation [wasi-libc][4]. However, WASI is not a standard and 81 language compilers don't always support it. 82 83 For example, AssemblyScript once supported WASI, but no longer does. Even 84 compilers that target WASI using [wasi-libc][4] have gaps. For example, 85 [TinyGo](tinygo) does not yet support `fd_readdir`. Some toolchains have a 86 hybrid approach. For example, Emscripten uses WASI for console output, but its 87 own virtual filesystem functions. Finally, the team behind WASI are 88 developing an incompatible, modular replacement to the current version. 89 90 It is important to note that even when system interfaces are supported, some 91 users prefer a freestanding compilation target that restricts them. This helps 92 them control binary size and performance. 93 94 In summary, system interfaces in WebAssembly are not standard and are immature. 95 Developers need to understand and test the system interfaces they rely on. 96 Testing ensures not only the present capabilities, but also they continue to 97 operate as the ecosystem matures. 98 99 ## Concurrency 100 101 WebAssembly does not yet support true parallelism; it lacks support for 102 multiple threads, atomics, and memory barriers. (It may someday; See 103 the [threads proposal][5].) 104 105 For example, a compiler targeting [WASI]({{< ref "/specs#wasi" >}}), generates 106 a `_start` function corresponding to `main` in the original source code. When 107 the WebAssembly runtime calls `_start`, it remains on the same thread of 108 execution until that function completes. 109 110 Concretely, if using wazero, a Wasm function call remains on the calling 111 goroutine until it completes. 112 113 In summary, while true that host functions can do anything, including launch 114 processes, Wasm binaries compliant with the [WebAssembly Core Specification] 115 ({{< ref "/specs#core" >}}) cannot do anything in parallel, unless they use 116 non-standard instructions or conventions not yet defined by the specification. 117 118 ### Compiling Parallel Code to Serial Wasm 119 120 Until this [changes][5], language compilers cannot generate Wasm that can 121 control scheduling within a function or safely modify memory in parallel. 122 In other words, one function cannot do anything in parallel. 123 124 This impacts how programming language primitives translate to Wasm: 125 126 * Garbage collection invokes on the runtime host's calling thread instead of 127 in the background. 128 * Language-defined threads or co-routines fail compilation or are limited to 129 sequential processing. 130 * Locks and barriers fail compilation or are implemented unsafely. 131 * Async functions including I/O execute sequentially. 132 133 Language compilers often used shared infrastructure, such as [LLVM][6] and 134 [Binaryen][7]. One tool that helps in translation is Binaryen's [Asyncify][8], 135 which lets a language support synchronous operations in an async manner. 136 137 ### Concurrency via Orchestration 138 139 To work around lack of concurrency at the WebAssembly Core abstraction, tools 140 often orchestrate pools of workers, and ensure a module in that pool is only 141 used sequentially. 142 143 For example, [waPC][9] provides a WASM module pool, so host callbacks can be 144 invoked in parallel, despite not being able to share memory. 145 146 [1]: https://github.com/tetratelabs/wazero/tree/main/site/content/languages 147 [2]: https://github.com/tetratelabs/wazero/stargazers 148 [3]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/contents.html 149 [4]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc 150 [5]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/threads 151 [6]: https://llvm.org 152 [7]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen 153 [8]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/blob/main/src/passes/Asyncify.cpp 154 [9]: https://github.com/wapc/wapc-go 155 [10]: https://ziglang.org/